It is a clear and cold morning but Face Book is loaded with warm wishes.
Happy New Year.
Indeed.
My daughter has reminded me that four years ago we were on a Carnival cruise to the Bahamas. That was so much fun.
The cruise had randomly assigned us to a table of total strangers that turned out to be a miracle of sorts. The characters, from all over the country and world, mingled and interacted so well that everyone thought we were old friends from the start.
I am trying to get a photo out of my archives to show but that may take a while. In the meantime, it is an extraordinary mental exercise revisiting those snippets of sheer pleasure where no one had an agenda...no rules...and living in the moment was enough.
We visited the piano bar one night. The pianist was very obliging for his "Jersey Girls" and we asked him to play Jerry Lee Lewis' "Balls of Fire". The piano started pounding and he gave a enthusiastic impression of the master. We had most of our dining group present.... and I even had a moment of madness and tried to dance.
The exuberant group and dancing spilled out into the corridor just in time for a visit from the ship's top brass. By this time the small lounge was packed. The Captain and Cruise Director had popped in to see what the noise was all about... and gave a thumbs up.
After they left, our pianist cheered....he said we just got him a positive review. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah!
Of course we gave him a handsome tip. We dropped in the next evening and his substitute told us that he couldn't talk after singing and playing our session and needed a day off. We were hoarse too...but a round of Cosmos fixed that.
Sometimes we need to remember that joy is a common quantity.
Sunday, January 1, 2017
Incorporating Inclusiveness in the New Year
Reflections
on Intersectionality
Systems of privilege
and inequality exist in culture and are marked by differences that relate to a
norm. When norms are broken, there are consequences. Women and Gender Studies is
a means to analyze the complicated interactions of multiple identities.
Awareness of privilege and discrimination, as related to perspectives and
context, can contribute to change. In her essay “Intersectionality”, Vivian M.
May says, “Intersectionality calls for analytic methods, modes of political
action, and ways of thinking about persons, rights, and liberation informed by
multiplicity.”(WVFV 81)
Normative and
conventional elements run like power cables under a building, unseen, but the
source of all available energy to drive essential services. Stereotypes operate
as short cuts, speed up society, but result in unequal treatment of
nonconforming groups. Intersectionality points
out these areas of oppression of all forms, not just sexism and racism, in
order to pinpoint different aspects that contribute to disharmony. It is crucial
to ferret out those elusive elements which lurk in individual experience to influence
context.
May points out that
“Some forms of dependence (heteronormative, middle class) are more idealized
(e.g., women’s dependence on men who are their fathers or husbands for
protection and care), whereas others are stigmatized as deviant and in need of
remediation (e.g., poor women’s dependency on the state via welfare) (80)”. One is socially approved; the other perceived
negatively.
In the case of
disability issues, intersectionality may actually diminish activism. The issues
are indistinguishable from each other when placed in opposition, as “enabled”
versus “disabled”. The accent on
oppression diminishes universal issues of handicapped persons because it assumes
a political norm for physical lack of access. By insisting on classism and racism to prove
discrimination, intersectionality interferes with change predicated on
disability and gender.
Alison Kafer, writing
in Feminist, Queer Crip, voices her
concerns about cultural and social stigma from stereotypes concerning persons
outside the hetereonormative existence. The FBL billboards messages emphasize
“courage”, “determination”, “opportunity”. She says, “Who is involved in
determining the characteristics valued in a particular community? Who is
included in—or excluded from---the community itself? (100)” The pop culture
approach to the physically disabled, as only needing to work harder, or change
their attitudes toward their limitations, must be contested. She advocates for
activism and dissent.
May says,
“Intersectionality offers a vision of future possibilities that can be more
fully realized once a shift toward the multiple takes place”. (81) When surface assumptions create a norm that
seems to accommodate most of the population, it runs the danger of becoming
stagnant. One example, concerning Brazil, is found in Intersectionality by Patricia Hill Collins and Sirma Bilge. Since
Brazil has a history of colonial invaders intermarrying with native peoples, it
has promoted a policy of racial democracy. This seems inclusive on the surface, but a
group of feminists with African roots gathered to protest being homogenized.
Coming together as African-centered women to preserve heritage is a
locus-resource for non-blacks to experience.
Narrowing into specific interest groups
therefore provides an almost infinite number of intersections. This “shift
toward the multiple” fertilizes the imagination and stimulates change. What might seem counter-productive for Brazil’s
political theory of racial democracy, might lead to other groups following
their example. What may seem positive, by subscribing to popular community
values, is actually counter-productive for a disabled individual whose
perspective from a bed or chair will never change. Piercing the stereotype of limitations will go
a long way to enable empathy and activism. This heightened awareness of the
“other”, whether racism, sexism, classism, or crip, will result in greater
sensitivity and appreciation for all kinds of diversity.
Understanding the approaches that enable tolerance among human beings of all races, cultures, and ranges of ability is absolutely necessary for survival of the species.
Tuesday, December 13, 2016
Thoughts on Disability
Defining
Disability and Driftwood
You have to love this
author, Alison Kafer. She begins her chapter, “A Future for Whom: Passing on Billboard
Liberation”, by commenting on Superman. She
comments while looking up at a billboard of Christopher Reeves which is
intended to inspire recognition at his dreadful accident and acknowledge his
courage. However, the public relations
campaign behind this feel-good message is subversive. Actor Reeves is
associated with his most famous role of Superman. Now he is paralyzed and
unable to survive without help from personal aides. Kafer points out that the billboard image of
his disability, other than an oxygen tube in the corner, lessens the impact of
his disability. . The considerable financial and medical resources which
supported his existence are not visible. They are invisible by intent. “Values.com/Foundation
for a Better Life” sponsors the billboard and their agenda is politically ultra
conservative.
Reeves is white, male,
and his billboard photo appeals to conservative values by taking advantage of
America’s white/male/hegemony. He is obviously super-masculine in spite of his
physical paralysis. This is deliberately tendered as success due to his manly
“courage”. If you are a different gender
or race, you are invisible.
Community values trump
individual obstacles. By making public perception one of individual
vulnerability, by not acknowledging the enormous numbers of physically and
mentally impaired coming home from war, the attitudes presented by FBL’s
Superman billboard thrust the burden of disability on the individual. The
message is one of “buck up” instead of “how can we help”.
This politicization of
disability is intended to diminish and quiet activists who campaign for
accommodations for the handicapped, or as Kafer puts it, the “queer crips”.
Anyone who is outside the norm, whether sexually, racially, or disabled is
different and queer. Numbers of elderly
are expected to swell the ranks of those outside the norm. Consider that stereotyped
wheelchair persons are commonly perceived as less intelligent and therefore
undesirable. For decades, handicapped persons were sterilized so they could not
have children who might pass on “defective” genes. Politicizing ignores reality and makes the
elderly and disabled expendable.
A wheelchair bound
person spends a lot of time waiting for suitable vehicle transportation which
leads to the concept of “crip time”. Crip (read crippled) time has to allow for situations that do not accommodate
physical needs. Not only is the issue
one of access, but the unexpected aspects of physical transport lead to living
in the moment. This philosophy arose out of the HIV and AIDS era, when recovery
was dismal and any future belonged to others. Crip time cannot be regulated by
the clock; it moves to a disjointed rhythm that depends on need and services.
Perhaps the most egregious attitude toward
handicapped people is the notion that a disabled person is limited because they
are not trying hard enough. Kafer writes, “…FBL’s website clearly delineates
the group’s perspective by encouraging ‘adherence to a set of quality values
through personal accountability and by raising the level of expectations of
performance of all individuals regardless of religion or race’ (89)”. By emphasizing community values over personal
needs, the conservative position makes it clear that vulnerable disabled have
to, and should, fend for themselves.
Disabled
who dare to speak out, these“queer crips”, have to fight hard for ramps,
elevators, public access across many venues, but more importantly, just to
maintain their position in public consciousness. Kafer says, “I envision a
media campaign that favors dissent at least as much as unity, that recognizes
political protest and activism as signs of courage, that is as concerned with
collective responsibility and accountability as personal (100)”. It doesn’t take
much to give a hand up. Someone living in a physically challenged body just
wants to get on with living.
"Intersectionality" and Equality
Intersectionality
Toolbox
In their highly
regarded text, Intersectionality,Patricia
Hill Collins and Sirma Bilge write, “Intersectionality is a way of
understanding and analyzing the complexity of the world, in people, and in
human experience.” (2) This
intersectionality technique shows how many peoples interact and influence each
other. Their guide is helpful to understand and analyze how differing contexts
of human experience impact social and political results. By suggesting multiple
possibilities for study, that might otherwise be overlooked by stereotyped
bias, it promises that a specific inequality is not as likely to fall through
the cracks. The authors note, “… intersectionality can be a useful analytic
tool for thinking about and developing strategies to achieve….equity ((3)”.
Major social elements
such as race, class, gender, sex, etc. exist in nearly infinite range of
possibilities. Considering complexities and permitting unexpected combinations
can produce positive results. Intersectionality rejects the usual “normative”
position in order to open up to the possibility of a more equal and level
playing field.
Inequality issues of gender
and LGBTQ can also be studied in the intersectionality framework. This is
helpful on constructing gender identity for those not able to advocate for
themselves. The authors note, “Relational thinking rejects either/or binary thinking…opposing theory to practice, scholarship
to activism, or blacks to whites. Instead, relationality embraces a both/and frame…examining their
interconnections (27)”. These interconnections pave the way for inclusiveness.
In an interesting example, intersectionality
shows how powerful wealthy business interests interfered with the political and
social structure of Brazil during the 2014 World Cup. FIFA soccer lobbied for
laws that restricted everything from travel to food concessions outside the
venue. Without considering the way all Brazilians might be affected, the concerns
of poor men and women were not included in tournament planning. Because many
people enjoy sports, it was assumed that even poverty stricken people would be
in favor of the extravagance. The opposite occurred. Brazilians suffered hardships
from the exclusivity of arrangements aimed at an international clientele
instead of local population. In spite of high expectations, Brazil lost the games
and lost millions of money. The scandal following the games suggested massive
bribery and corruption. The power domain enjoyed by the organizers had been
based on the assumption that sports benefit everyone. That was certainly not
the case for women because only men can compete in the tournament. That was not
the case for non-athletes because the sport is exclusively for extraordinarily
talented athletes. A level playing field, for most of the country outside FIFA,
definitely did not exist.
Intersectionality, used
to study Brazil, discloses many social aspects not addressed by the common
assumption that there are no racial barriers. About a thousand Brazilian
feminists felt they were discriminated against and gathered to express their
African roots. This was contrary to Brazil’s policy of racial democracy which
emerged from its history as a colonial mix of native and outside nationalities.
The authors note that
the black women’s movement in Brazil, “shows how intellectual and political
activism work by growing by a specific set of concerns in a specific social
situation, in this case the identity politics of the Afro-Brazilian women
(28)”. This focuses thinking about social inequality and power relationships in
various contexts. The importance of
context broadens the appreciation of specific kinds of problems in social
situations across the world and the awareness that one size does not fit all.
Sunday, December 4, 2016
The Transgender Need for Recognition
Transgender
Dilemma
Leslie Feinberg was a
transgendered activist who wrote the groundbreaking novel, Stone Butch Blues. Feinberg died in 2014 but her novel is
relevant in our culture as America’s political institutions resist inclusion. Her
lead character of Jess Goldberg comes from Feinberg’s own bitter experience as
a lesbian Jewish woman trying to fit in as living as a man. Trapped in a
homophobic society by the male power structure, her struggles are tragic. The forces which shaped her identity jump off
the page with intensity that cannot be ignored.
As Dan Frosch
previously noted, “…gay and transgender advocates say transgender students…are
vulnerable to bullying and harassment” since institutions measure against a
norm. Nonconforming persons are targeted. In the novel, Jess Goldberg and her
friend Mona are jailed following a police raid against gays. She says, “The
drag queens were in the large cell next to ours. Mona and I smiled at each
other… Then she walked forward with them, rather than be dragged out (35)”.
This is Jess’s first experience with police brutality against gays. The text
continues, “About an hour later the cops brought Mona back…she could barely
stand…blood running down (35)”. Mona tells inexperienced Jess, “It changes you…what
they do to you in here…everyday on the streets---it changes you, you know?”
(35)
The queer person does not fit in and therefore
constantly fights for recognition. Feinberg’s character is not just lesbian,
but yearns for female love and a life gendered as a man. Jess struggles to find someone who understands
her quandary. She lives as a border
dweller, vigilant, with a foot in two worlds, trying to survive and how to fit
in. Without a model to follow, the unscripted journey fraught with disaster.
She dresses as a male but is incomplete without a companion to share her world
of fluidity. As Jess’s lover Edna puts it, “I don’t want to go back to the bars
and the fights. I just want a place to be with the people I love. I want to be accepted for who I am, and not
just in the gay world (218)”.
Leslie Steinberg
underwent hormone therapy and ultimately decided against continuing disruptive
treatment. Toward the end of her life, she reconciled with the body she was
born in and tried to increase awareness of the needs of gender queer issues. She
is gone too soon.
Deciding not to undergo gender modifying
surgery becomes a political barrier to those identifying documents that signal
change for a transgendered person. New Jersey’s Governor Chris Christie has
vetoed legislation, allowing birth certificates and passports to show transgender
name and sex change, unless the person has submitted to sex change surgery.
This means that not only is there still a challenge to a person’s liberty to be
at peace with one’s self, but there is a political mandate to inflict potential
harm on a person’s body. Not much has
changed institutionally since the homophobic abuse of pre-Stonewall police
raids on gay and lesbian bars, as so graphically pictured by Jess Goldberg in
Steinberg’s Stone Butch Blues.
Friday, November 18, 2016
Inscribing Gender on the Body: We Cannot All Be a Ten
Gender
Expectations Shape the Impossible
When you meet someone
for the first time, several things register: the overall impression of male or
female sex, specifics like hair, eyes, makeup or lack of it, clothing that
reinforces male or female gender, erect confident posture, or a yielding slouch
that signals submissiveness. This immediate “read” is complicated if all the
elements do not fit. American culture values thin, white, young as the
desirable norm. This unspoken but powerful yardstick discriminates against
Blacks, Asians, Latinos, the elderly and disabled, who are compelled to remake
their body image to fit in. Long hair is usually gendered feminine. However, if
the person with long hair is wearing trousers and work boots and wants to use
the Gents restroom, it provokes harassment.
Dan Frosch writes about Coy Mathis, born a boy but now at the heart of a
challenge to anti-discrimination against transgendered people. He writes, “…gay
and transgender advocates say transgender students…are vulnerable to bullying
and harassment (246)”. Political decisions and institutions cater to the norm
and these forms of “other” have to constantly fight for recognition and
consideration.
Women in American
culture feel pressured to have a larger bosom and some resort to plastic
surgery implants. In Donald Trump’s world, a woman with a small bosom has a
“hard time to be a 10”. This sexist labeling lies behind the insecurity many
women feel that they do not measure up to an unwritten norm. Joan Jacobs
Brumberg, writing in her essay Breast Buds and the ‘Training’ Bra, notes that a
girl’s insecurity begins early. She says, “…in gyms and locker rooms of
post-war junior high schools, girls began to look around to see who did and did
not wear a bra…and this visual information was very powerful (206)”. As mass produced clothing produced a need for
standard bra sizing, it also creates the idea of measuring up to a norm that
had to be reinforced in some way. She writes,
“The old idea that brassieres were frivolous or unnecessary for young girls was
replaced by a national discussion about their medical and psychological
benefits…. An adolescent girl needed a bra to prevent, sagging breasts…which
would create problems in nursing her future children (206)”. The bra also draws attention to the sexual
possibilities of breasts, rather than their biological function of nursing. The result is an obsession for everywoman to
present as a “ten”.
A woman’s hair
represents an inescapable biological connection to gendered expectations.
Thinking of hair as beautiful is culturally graded by sex but can also be
exploited as a way to enforce power. In the white privileged culture in the
United Stated, long fine straight hair is seen as beautiful. Minh-Ha T. Pham,
writing in her essay “If the Clothes Fit: A feminist Take on Fashion”, says,
“Professional women of color …consciously and unconsciously fashion themselves
in ways that diminish their racial difference (247)”. Asian women perm their
hair; Black women straighten their hair. She continues, “If fashion has been
used to introduce new ways of expressing womanhood, it has also been a tether
that keeps women’s social, economic and political opportunities permanently
attached to their appearances (248)”. Women in the daily eye as part of their
job, find that one’s natural styling is discouraged in favor of a treatment
that appeals to a media enforced norm. Rose
Weitz, writing in What We Do for Love, says, “If we ignore cultural
expectations for female appearance we pay a price in lost wages, diminished
marital prospects, lowered status, and so on (119)”.
One last thought: age gives one a different set of values. Seniors Rock.
Thursday, November 10, 2016
Thoughts on Gendering in Presidential Election
How Americans view sex
and gender has never been more relevant. We had a former First Lady and
Secretary of State with an unparallelled executive resume on paper. However by
gendered perception, the female candidate was doomed to second place. If
authoritative and assertive, she was regarded as bitchy and bossy. Photos of
her with her new grandchild could have softened the portrait and then she was
accused of lacking “stamina”. Her opponent was filmed crowing about his
voyeuristic ability to dominate the naked women competing in his beauty pageants,
and it was dismissed as men’s locker room talk.
To top it off on Election Day, one woman was interviewed as saying she
voted for Trump because “a woman should not be President”. This persisting gendering of women contributed
to an unexpected Republican victory.
Culture
Creates Concepts of Sex and Gender
Susan M. Shaw and Janet
Lee, in Women’s Voices and Feminist
Visions, note, “…gender is constructed through intersection with other
differences among women such as race, ethnicity, and class…related to other
systems of inequality and privilege (116)”.
Gender assignment, identity and expression contribute to notions of sex
and gender in ways peculiar to the United States. Sex is decided at birth, according
to obvious genitalia, and subsequent growth and behavior is channeled into
expected patterns according to this binary. If a person’s internal sense of
identity does not fit expected gender patterns, sexual labels go beyond binary
choices. Subsequent gender expression, which does not follow the binary view,
shapes social interactions which can unsettle one’s sense of self. (119) Countries beyond America do not challenge transgendered
identity in the same way which results in varying degrees of tolerance.
Evelyn Blackwood
discusses the many kinds of masculine expression among females in West Sumatra
and Indonesia. Since gender is defined
by intersections with other identities, each with their own perspectives and
agendas, it follows that some combinations will occur as exceptions to the
norm.
Transgender
may be applied to identities or practices that intersect queer socially
constructed binaries based on the usual male/female expectations. Female-bodied
persons may identify and live in ways which are casually stereotyped as male
gendered. Sometimes this takes the form
of transgendered females who “appropriate and manipulate cultural stereotypes
of ….a hybrid form of masculinity…as possessing a male soul in a female body
(150)”.
One of these identities in Indonesia is that
of “tomboi”. To deal with describing the
gender-fluid woman Dedi, instead of using “him” or “her”, Blackwood creates an
unusual form, “ h/er”. She says, “Dedi
was dressed in h/er typical man’s attire and appeared to be quite comfortable
around h/er family (151)”. This tomboi
enjoys moving about freely and sleeping wherever she wishes. She is not
concerned about sexual violence because her manner is masculine and tough.
Women are closely
watched so freedom is encoded as masculine privilege. The pressure for the female-bodied butch
tomboi to marry, presents difficulties. Blackwood says, “Marriage is the most
troubling challenge to their positionality as men (152)”. If married, would be
forced to live in the constant role of female. This is uncomfortable so many
transgendered put off the issue as long as possible. Dedi has compromised by
following female gendered expectations when at her mother’s house, as long as
it does not challenge her assumed masculinity. She will do repairs around the
house but will not cook. She is not viewed as a sexual rival by other men, but
rather as a woman with special insights. The text says, “…Dedi recalls h/er female
body as part of h/erself, giving voice to a cultural expectation that female
bodies produce female ways of knowing (154)”.
This shows that she has incorporated her body as part of her total
identity, not merely a phase or convenient pose.
As the article h/er
creates a space for Dedi in the discussion, Indonesia terms of address are much
more complicated. She notes, “People tend to employ gender-marked kin terms
when addressing acquaintances or close friends… (154)”. This results in tomboi identity being
expressed in public as a shield for moving freely, but gender-marked terms are
dropped when she is more secure at home and her defenses are down. The
transgender aspects of Didi’s persona also do not disrupt her culture because
family practices still read them as female. Blackwood says, “Social relations
of kinship and family connected tombois with discourses of femininity…and
offered the efficacy that tombois attained as intelligibly gendered beings…that
create space for themselves and their partners (155)”.
Seniors Rock!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)